[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel Releases
Dan Kegel wrote:

> 2.4.x should continue to use -preY.
> There's no need for a -rcY as some have suggested.
> All we need to do to avoid messes like the 2.4.15 debacle
> is to insist that a 2.4.X-preY should not be
> released as final 2.4.X until the pre's been out for a week,
> and there should never be any changes introduced into a final
> that didn't cook for a week as a pre.

I don't see the difference between a -rc that has cooked for a week,
and a -pre that has cooked for a week, except that -rc sounds more
like "this is *maybe* the next stable kernel", whereas -pre still
sounds "beta".

That said, I think the week long delay is a *good* idea.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.210 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site