[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.15-pre9
In article <> claimed this objective:
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:44:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> >
>> > I think I'm ready to hand this over to Marcelo.
>> Aren't you going to include Tim Schmielau's patch to handle uptime larger than
>> 497 days? It is a cool feature we always liked to have.
>Quite frankly, right now I'm in "handle only bugs that can crash the
>system mode". Anything that takes 497 days to see is fairly low on my
>priority list. My highest priority, in fact, is to get 2.4.15 out without
>any embarrassment.

Back in the 60's when GE was still a mainframe manufacturer they had a
counter which rolled over at about 35 days. When it started failing
their competitors had good time with "GECOS fails to fail as expected."
That *is* an embarrassment.

con06:news> uptime
9:56am up 427 days, 19:00, 2 users, load average: 0.87, 0.88, 0.83

bill davidsen <>
His first management concern is not solving the problem, but covering
his ass. If he lived in the middle ages he'd wear his codpiece backward.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.119 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site