lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Release Policy
Date
Followup to:  <20011126.171301.50592818.davem@redhat.com>
By author: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:04:02 -0800
>
> Marcelo, if someone sends you a patch which has not been thoroughly
> reviewed on the appropriate mailing list, I would urge you to
> peremptorily shitcan it. There is no reason why you alone should
> be responsible for reviewing kernel changes.
>
> Are you suggesting that, for example, I should send every Sparc change
> to this list?
>

appropriate != this.

> I bet a lot of what he is seeing are driver and arch updates.
>
> Such updates really only need to go through his "stupid filter"
> when it is coming from the maintainer, but it does add up and
> take up time.

Obviously. If it's for a maintained subsystem:

a) if it's from the subsystem maintainer, sanity-check it.
b) if it's not, dump it or reject with the appropriate notice.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans