[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
Sean Elble wrote:

>>I tried switching to Redhat's 2.4.9-13 kernel and it acts Alot better.
>>Not only does 2.4.9-13 not get the 30 second delay, but it also seems to
>>take advantage of caching. 2.4.16 takes the same moment of time each
>>time, even tho it should have cached it all into memory the first time.
> Unless Red Hat has specifically added Andrea's new VM code to the 2.4.9
> kernel, then that kernel is still using the old VM.

Not exactly. That kernel is -ac based (plus lots of other patches, some
of them VM tweaks) and is a Van Riel VM.


Doug Ledford <>
Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
e-mailing me about problems

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.065 / U:1.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site