[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
    Sean Elble wrote:

    >>I tried switching to Redhat's 2.4.9-13 kernel and it acts Alot better.
    >>Not only does 2.4.9-13 not get the 30 second delay, but it also seems to
    >>take advantage of caching. 2.4.16 takes the same moment of time each
    >>time, even tho it should have cached it all into memory the first time.
    > Unless Red Hat has specifically added Andrea's new VM code to the 2.4.9
    > kernel, then that kernel is still using the old VM.

    Not exactly. That kernel is -ac based (plus lots of other patches, some
    of them VM tweaks) and is a Van Riel VM.


    Doug Ledford <>
    Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
    e-mailing me about problems

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:3.271 / U:5.572 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site