[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Release Policy [was: Linux 2.4.16 ]
    On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:54:11PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
    > > I like the ISC's release methods. The do -rc's (-pre's would be fine
    > > for the kernel as it is already established), each -rc fixes problems
    > > found with the previous. When an -rc has been out long enough with no
    > > more bug reports they release that code, WITHOUT changes.
    > Thats exactly the idea with the "pre-final" thingie.

    Most groups use -rc release candidate releases, so using that instead of
    -pre-final would lead to the least confusion.

    A 2.4.17 release might look like this:

    Release 2.4.17-preX until all the new stuff you want is in.
    Release 2.4.17-rcX until no-one complains about the new stuff.
    Release the last 2.4.17-rcX as 2.4.17 and hope no one finds anything
    embarassing (which will probably happen anyway.

    Seems to me though, that you can simply put a note in your Changelog which
    -pre releases are bound to be to the next final revision, this will save us
    from yet another numbering scheme.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.022 / U:17.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site