lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove needless BKL from release functions
Date
Am Freitag 23 November 2001 11:47 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> In article <Pine.SOL.4.33.0111231106530.7403-100000@sun3.lrz-muenchen.de>
you wrote:
> > While this is doubtlessly true, please don't do things like removing the
> > lock from interfaces like the call to open() in the input subsystem.
> > People may depend on the lock being held there. Having open() under BKL
> > simplifies writing USB device drivers.
>
> Beeing completly single-threaded also simplifies writing unclean drivers..

This is true. However USB drivers have to cope with devices becoming
unplugged at all times. The races this produces are not nice.

> BTW, I've attached a patch that fixes the largest input races (against
> 2.4.6), I don't see how to change the total lack of locking for other data
> structures without an API change, though.

This looks very good. Could you get this to the maintainer ?

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.094 / U:1.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site