[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Which gcc version?
    On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, J Sloan wrote:

    > This is all silly FUD - time for the pointer again -

    Redhat apologists are given the due they deserve.

    Their first cut at a released 2.96 should never have made it out of the
    labs alive, and for that matter, neither should have 7.0.

    That said, the versions in 7.1, and the patches available have done
    reasonably well for everything that I've tried to compile (kernels

    What are they going to do about gcc 3.0.x? It'll be amusing to watch.

    -- John E. Jasen (
    -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:36.944 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site