[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which gcc version?
Dixitur de M. Edward (Ed) Borasky respondebo ad:

> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Ra?l[ISO-8859-1] N??ez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> > Sooner or later the kernel will need to be ported to gcc 3.x
> > series, so, the sooner it gets tested with this compiler, the better.
> One of the regression tests for gcc is to compile *a* Linux kernel, although
> I have no clue which kernel they use, or if they just haul down the latest one
> from the Internet.

It's one of the 2.2 series IIRC. Go

> > Anyway, if you have gcc 2.95.x installed onto your distro, use
> > that for the kernel for maximum stability.

I've run 2.4.3-ac7 plus andrea's rwsem, compiled on a gcc-3 beta
of April 2001, since then (not in 24/7 though) with _no_ problems.

| This message body is covered by Germanic and International | OpenBSD30
| Copyright law. Modification of any kind and redistribution | centericq
| via AOL or the Microsoft network are strictly prohibited!! | UIN seems
| Scientific-style quotation permitted if due credits given. | 132315236

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.156 / U:2.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site