[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Swap vs No Swap.
On November 22, 2001 08:25, war wrote:
> Why have SWAP if you don't need it - answer that.?

> > BS. You don't use swap INSTEAD of RAM, but AS WELL AS. Moving less
> > frequently used data to swap allows you to put more frequently used data
> > in RAM, which DOES speed things up. (At least, it does if the VM system
> > works properly :P)

Are you even reading what they're saying? Having swap lets you move less
frequently used data to disk in favour of having more frequently used data in

Personally, I have more than enough RAM to run a fairly busy KDE2 desktop,
and still have over 128megs in disk cache. And I still run with swap. The VM
seems to find about 40megs of data I'm -simply not using-, and it now has the
freedom to push that to swap so it can cache things that I -do use-. Although
the more RAM you have, the less significant the results are, you'll find that
in normal desktop/workstation/server use, the kernel will -always- find
something to swap out to give itself more cache, and more cache is a very
good thing. It's not fucking rocket science.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.103 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site