[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sunrpc woes with tux2 in 2.4.15-pre8,9
Trond Myklebust wrote:

> Something is indeed very wrong. Your setup uses a PIII, and no SMP. It
> shouldn't be requiring atomic_dec_and_lock() at all. Certainly this is
> the case on my own setup on stock 2.4.15-pre9.
> Could you check that the TUX patch isn't squashing the #define and
> test for ATOMIC_DEC_AND_LOCK that is contained in
> include/linux/spinlock.h in the stock Linus kernel. The latter is a
> workaround that is designed to stop MODVERSIONS from interfering with
> the re-#definition of atomic_dec_and_lock() in spinlock.h.

Yes, it looks like he's doing just that -

I built it with smp enabled and the problem
goes away, so it's an implicit assumption
of smp in the current tux code.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.067 / U:1.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site