[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Swap vs No Swap.
Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, James A Sutherland wrote:
>>Obviously, there are cases where removing swap breaks the system
>>entirely, but even in other cases, adding swap should *never* degrade
>>performance. (In theory, anyway; in practice, it still needs
> Not quite true. The VM cannot look into the future, so if
> you have swap it could have just swapped out the application
> on the desktop you're about to switch to ;)

I tend to agree. Especially since in some cases (i.e. after
a long compilation (read : lots of code)), the VM has the most
excellent idea to swap out all the GUI (X+apps) and everyone
here knows how long it can be to restore the GUI in that case.

Obviously the problem is very much lessened, in my case, when
i put the swap partition on the *other* drive than the root fs.
Both are ATA100 (40GB 60GXPs), and the system is more responsive
with swap on hdc while / in on hda, than both on hda.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:1.368 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site