[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Jan Hudec wrote:
> > > > *a++ = byte_rev[*a]
> > > It looks perferctly okay to me. Anyway, whenever would you listen to a
> > > C++ book talking about good C coding :p
> >
> It's simple. If any object is modified twice without an intervening
> sequence point, the results are undefined.

That's not all. There's another case - when modification and use of
the same object happen in undefined order.

And that's precisely what happens here - same as in case of (x + ++x)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.086 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site