Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:58:03 -0800 | From | Mike Kravetz <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ... |
| |
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 07:20:36AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote: > > One more. Throughout our MQ evaluation, it was also true that > the overall performance particularly for large thread counts was > very sensitive to the goodness function, that why a na_goodness_local > was introduced. >
Correct, we did notice measurable differences in performance just from the additional (unnecessary) checks in goodness. Unfortunately, the current version of MQ has 3 different (but similar) variations of the goodness function. This is UGLY, and I intend to clean this up (without impacting performance of course :).
-- Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |