lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ...
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 07:20:36AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
>
> One more. Throughout our MQ evaluation, it was also true that
> the overall performance particularly for large thread counts was
> very sensitive to the goodness function, that why a na_goodness_local
> was introduced.
>

Correct, we did notice measurable differences in performance just
from the additional (unnecessary) checks in goodness. Unfortunately,
the current version of MQ has 3 different (but similar) variations
of the goodness function. This is UGLY, and I intend to clean this
up (without impacting performance of course :).

--
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.064 / U:0.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site