[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] Re: 2.4.15-pre5: /proc/cpuinfo broken

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Frankly, I'd prefer to try (b) before reverting to (a). Patch doing that
> variant follows. Linus, your opinion?

(d) make seq_file have my originally suggested "subposition" code.

Ie make the X low bits of "pos" be the position in the record, with the
high bits of "pos" being the current "record index" kind of thing.

That makes lseek() happy.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.138 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site