Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:53:46 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re: 2.4.15-pre5: /proc/cpuinfo broken |
| |
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > Frankly, I'd prefer to try (b) before reverting to (a). Patch doing that > variant follows. Linus, your opinion?
(d) make seq_file have my originally suggested "subposition" code.
Ie make the X low bits of "pos" be the position in the record, with the high bits of "pos" being the current "record index" kind of thing.
That makes lseek() happy.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |