lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] block-highmem-all-18
On Fri, Nov 16 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Gérard Roudier <groudier@free.fr>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:59:02 +0100 (CET)
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > - Add sym2 can_dma_32 flag (me)
> ^^^^^^^^^^ Pooaaahhh!:) What's this utter oddity ?
> Only dma 32 ? :-)
>
> It is workaround for buggy drivers, when set it means that single SG
> list entry request will be handled correctly. When clear it means
> that single entry SG lists are to be avoided by the block layer.
>
> Many devices would explode when given single entry scatterlist. :(
>
> It's naming is questionable... that I agree with. The name should be
> more suggestive to what it really means.

Heh, actually Dave the single_sg_ok flag used to specify just that, but
Arjan noted that we never needed to trust that functionality when
!can_dma_32. So now can_dma_32 being set implies that the HBA driver
also gets the single sg entry correct.

To answer Gerard's question -- with can_dma_32 set, scsi_merge will set
the correct bounce value based on the PCI device DMA mask set. So dma_32
is indeed a misnomer, it was introduced before we supported full 64-bit
dma, and should now just be called can_highmem_io or something similar.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.065 / U:15.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site