Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 17 Nov 2001 02:05:41 +0100 | From | Stefan Smietanowski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] AMD SMP capability sanity checking. |
| |
Hi.
>>Ok, since you're misunderstanding me, where do I find out which is >>which, ie CPUID 660 is an ... and CPUID 670 is an ... >> > > Ah, gotcha. Not sure off hand of any resource. > My x86info program has them documented in source form.. > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/davej/x86info/
Good enough for me.
> I'll extrapolate those into a human readable table, and put > it on my webpage sometime.. I've been meaning to put up > x86info dumps from various cpu's on there actually. > (I'll take this opportunity to ask anyone with a few spare > minutes to send -a output to me (NOT to linux-kernel btw)) > > >>Point me to some good place to find out and I'm happy. >> > > If you want to look at that source, its in AMD/identify.c > The last released version isn't aware of MP/XP's, but has the > earlier models covered.
Umm. Tell me I'm wrong, but didn't your patch say the 670 was ok for SMP ?
The SMP according to your program is a Duron (Morgan Core).
So the Morgon Duron is ok for SMP and the Palomino AthlonXP is not ?
*bashes hand against head*
// Stefan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |