lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.4.x has finally made it!
From
Date
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
>
> > It's a benchmark, lighten up! ;)
>
> Well, he wanted to benchmark everyday use, and disk latency is also an
> issue for everyday use, of course;

But it's more a measure of your disk subsystem than your VM efficiency
(unless something is badly wrong).

> so that's kind of pointless getting
> rid of I/O and benchmarking the cache. fsync() efficiency comes into
> play and wants to be benchmarked as well. How do you know if your
> fsync() syncs what's needed, the whole partition, the partition's meta
> data (softupdates!) or the world (all blocks)?

A very good point that I hadn't considered.

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.081 / U:4.940 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site