lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:14:22AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <20011112.152304.39155908.davem@redhat.com> you write:
> > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:59:05 +1100
> >
> > (atomic_inc & atomic_dec_and_test for every packet, anyone?).
> >
> > We already do pay that price, in skb_release_data() :-)
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear! skb_release_data() does an atomic ops on the
> skb data region, which is almost certainly on the same CPU. This is
> an atomic op on a global counter for the module, which almost
> certainly isn't.
>
> For something which (statistically speaking) never happens (module
> unload).
>

Is this in the fast path or slow path?

If it only happens on (un)load, then there isn't any cost until it's needed...

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.117 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site