Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:44:41 +0100 | From | François Cami <> | Subject | Re: Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14) |
| |
Matthew D. Pitts wrote:
> Umm... Linus, when are you going to open the 2.5.x development cycle? That > is how we used to catch this kind of thing.
*eager to test 2.5* I guess that's one good idea, yes... less 'beta' in the current 'stable' tree means that there actually is a dev tree.
And we're back at what Sean Elble wrote about SGI having two trees for IRIX.
François
> Matthew D. Pitts > Pitts Computer Services > mpitts@suite224.net > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr> > To: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@yahoo.com> > Cc: <joeja@mindspring.com>; "John Alvord" <jalvo@mbay.net>; > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:03 PM > Subject: Re: Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop > back broken in 2.2.14) > > > >>I am wondering too... Anyone got ideas on this ? >> >>I would like to avoid some specific problems... especially >>bugs that show up when compiling a certain module / feature >>of the kernel, like the loopback in 2.4.14. >> >>Those should be very easy to get rid of >>[it only takes some kernel testers to debug that early, if only >>there actually were a feature freeze that last for one day...]. >> >>François >> > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |