Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:13:51 +0200 | From | Ville Herva <> | Subject | Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] lvm in 2.4.15.pre3 |
| |
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:04:12PM +0000, you [Patrick Caulfield] claimed: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 05:51:01PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 02:34:32PM +0000, you [Patrick Caulfield] claimed: > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:23:37PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000, you [Alan Cox] claimed: > > > > > > Please apply the following patch to LVM in 2.4.13pre3. > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like the LVM patch that came from Alan calls alloc/free_kiovec_sz > > > () > > > > > > functions which only exist in his tree. > > > > > > > > > > Just sent Linus the same thing 8) > > > > > > > > Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I see the LVM in .15pre3 is 0.9.1beta2. Are there > > > > plans to merge something newer like 1.0.1pre4? > > > > > > I think you've misread the patch: > > > > > > lvm.h:#define LVM_RELEASE_NAME "1.0.1-rc4(ish)" > > > > Ummh, maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my copy of 2.4.15pre3 says > > > > less -N include/linux/lvm.h: > > 67 #ifndef _LVM_H_INCLUDE > > 68 #define _LVM_H_INCLUDE > > 69 > > 70 #define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM 0.9.1_beta2 (18/01/2001)" > > 71 > > 72 #include <linux/config.h> > > 73 #include <linux/version.h> > > > > > ./drivers/md/lvm-internal.h:#define _LVM_INTERNAL_H_VERSION "LVM"LVM_RELEASE_NAME" ("LVM_RELEASE_DATE")" > > > > Does it generate the LVM_RELEASE_NAME dynamically on first build? > > No it doesn't. > > I can only assume your patch hasn't applied correctly - look at the patch > itself: > > @@ -67,9 +73,11 @@ > #ifndef _LVM_H_INCLUDE > #define _LVM_H_INCLUDE > > -#define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM 0.9.1_beta2 (18/01/2001)" > +#define LVM_RELEASE_NAME "1.0.1-rc4(ish)" > +#define LVM_RELEASE_DATE "03/10/2001" > + > +#define _LVM_KERNEL_H_VERSION "LVM "LVM_RELEASE_NAME" ("LVM_RELEASE_DATE")" > > -#include <linux/config.h> > #include <linux/version.h>
It must be that (I was using non-gnu patch(1)).
Sorry for the noise.
BTW: When was 1.0.1-rc4 merged to -ac / mainline? I missed that...
-- v --
v@iki.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |