[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: No locking is needed ... why?
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Kirill Ratkin wrote:

> Could somebody explain me this comment?:
> /*
> * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues so that
> * no locking is needed.
> */

> I didn't understand why packets are placed so and why
> locking isn't needed?

Each CPU has its own data structure here. This means no
other CPU will touch this queue (they have their own)
so there is nobody we could ever race against.


DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? (volunteers needed)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:0.034 / U:7.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site