[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: No locking is needed ... why?
Kirill Ratkin wrote:

>Could somebody explain me this comment?:
> * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues so
> * no locking is needed.
> */
>struct softnet_data
> int throttle;
> int cng_level;
> int avg_blog;
> struct sk_buff_head input_pkt_queue;
> struct net_device *output_queue;
> struct sk_buff *completion_queue;
>} __attribute__((__aligned__(SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
>I didn't understand why packets are placed so and why
>locking isn't needed?

As I understand this, the only reason u lock is

1) In an SMP or multiprocessor system, you suspect somebody else is running
simultaneously with you, this can lead to two or more processors executing
the same code simultaneously, this may lead to races.(which u do not want).
2) In a Multiprocessor or uniprocesor, data is shared among user processes in the kernel
between a user process in the kernel and an interrupt context
(like an irq handler or a bottom half or a tasklet).

So if u have a situation where (2) does not hold and u have a multiprocessor system,
per CPU data need not be locked, since it is not visible/used by other processors.

Did I get it right?

>Do You Yahoo!?
>NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to
>More majordomo info at
>Please read the FAQ at

Information transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro and/or its Customers and
is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without
proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this
information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please
notify us immediately at and delete this mail
from your records.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:0.028 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site