[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Quotactl change

> Al - is the attached patch more along the lines of what you
> were after?
> Jan - I think this is actually alot closer to what you were
> talking about when we last discussed this. Can you see any
> problems from a VFS quota point of view here? I had to make
> small interface changes to a couple of the dquot.c routines
> to make this simpler/more uniform in places - could you have
> cross-check those for me?
I see two problems:

1) You changed interface do dquot_sync() - so you should also
change DQUOT_SYNC() macro in quotaops.h (rename argument) and
all callers of DQUOT_SYNC() macro...

2) It seems to me that validate_quotactl() will actually never return
superblock - instead of 'ret = 0;' there should be 'return sb;'
and that test 'if (ret)' should be removed....

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:0.095 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site