lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems
So the buffer is big enought for your traffic, I suppose.

I saw something similar to your report, but indeed the buffer was too
small.

A good thing would be to see a packet dropped and the entries in
/proc/net/ip_conntrack, so that it will be possible to infer something.

with 2.4.10 i see packet tracing working very well also under
eavy network loads if the buffer is big enought...

and you are not using the controvers unclean module...

On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote:
>
> > and what is the content of
> > /proc/net/ip_conntrack
> > file?
> >
> > how big is the buffer you are using for packet tracing?
> > (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max)
>
> Well, I'm not going to send that file to the Internet at large, but
> ip_conntrack current has about 2100 lines and the max is 65535.
>
> -jwb
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05    [W:0.055 / U:3.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site