Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 9 Oct 2001 23:37:19 +0400 | From | "Oleg A. Yurlov" <> | Subject | Re[2]: RAID sync |
| |
Hi, Neil,
Tuesday, October 09, 2001, 3:26:32 AM, you wrote:
>> Kernel 2.4.6.SuSE-4GB-SMP, 2 CPU, 2Gb RAM, 4 HDD SCSI, M/B Intel L440GX. >> Messages from dmesg: NB> snip >> md: now! >> md: sdb2's event counter: 0000001c >> md: sda2's event counter: 0000001d NB> snip >> Why RAID do not start synchronization ? It is normal ?
NB> Yes. NB> A difference of 1 in the event counters isn't considered enough to NB> treat on of them as old, and presumably the newest one (sda2) was NB> marked clean. NB> This could happen if the array was shut down cleanly, the new super NB> block (with the dirty bit cleared) was written to sda2, but the new NB> superblock was NOT written to sdb2 for some reason. In this situation NB> there is no need to resync the array.
NB> Could this be what happened in your case?
Server is slow die (error in VM, server lost procfs) and rebooted by 'reboot -f'... I don't know what happen with RAID in this case.
NB> NeilBrown
-- Oleg A. Yurlov aka Kris Werewolf, SysAdmin OAY100-RIPN mailto:kris@spylog.com +7 095 332-03-88
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |