[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5
> Agreed if you add the polling cardbus bit.
> Note polling cardbus would require more changes than the above.

I don't think it does. There are two pieces to the problem

a) Not dying horribly
b) Handling it elegantly

b) is driver specific (NAPI etc) and I think well understood to the point
its being used already for performance reasons

a) is as simple as

if(stuck_in_irq(foo) && irq_shared(foo))

We know spoofing a shared irq is safe.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.120 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site