[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Of course we agree that such a "polling router/firewall" behaviour must
> > not be the default but it must be enabled on demand by the admin via
> > sysctl or whatever else userspace API. And I don't see any problem with
> > that.
> No I don't agree. "Stop random end users crashing my machine at will" is not
> a magic sysctl option - its a default.

I think (Ingo's?) analogy of an airbag was appropriate, if that's indeed
how the code winds up functioning.

Having a mechanism that prevents what would otherwise be a lockup is
useful. NAPI is useful. Having both would be nice :)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.096 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site