lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: %u-order allocation failed


--On Sunday, October 07, 2001 12:30 PM -0600 "Eric W. Biederman"
<ebiederman@uswest.net> wrote:

>> Note also that something (not sure what) has made fragmentation
>> increasingly prevalent over the years since the buddy allocator
>> was originally put in.
>
> Actually it seems to be situations like the stack now being two pages

Instrumentation posted here before appears to corellate fragmentation
being /caused/ with I/O activity (single bonnie process and thus a
single 8k stack frame). My own guess is that it is due to
a different persistence of various caches.

I haven't seen anyone before blaming stack frame allocation
as a /cause/ of fragmenation - I've heard people say they
notice fragmentation more as stack frame allocs start to
fail - but that's a symptom.

--
Alex Bligh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.077 / U:1.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site