lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ? (fwd)
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:25:36PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 02:42:10PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > > Should be fine with ext3 and XFS. It's not a journaling problem as
> > > much as NFS assuming a particular property of the filesystem.
>
> > Err, I meant it is stable from all reports for recent kernels:-/.... excuse me.
>
> Yes, and it's also worth noting that this same NFS assumption will
> break exports of _all_ filesystems which don't have simple static
> inum/filehandle capabilities. Reiserfs should work just fine now but
> the same NFS problem is still present if you do other things such as
> trying to re-export a SMB mount as NFS.
>

Yes, this issue has been reported many times on the samba mailing lists...

Are there any network filesystems on linux that have the "static
inum/filehandle capabilities"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.090 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site