[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: %u-order allocation failed
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, David Schwartz wrote:

> >The system is beafy enough to tolerate something mundane as this. It should
> >definitely not die.
> A fork bomb with no limits attempts to create an infinite number of
> processes. No system can be that beefy.

I was refering to the mundane load of with 5 processes. Something
the systems should withstand. If you have more then 10GB of database to
access you would want it to work. I am not talking about a lot of
processes but a lot of disk IO.

I have just one box running SMP with highmem and that one is acting
funny. All the other SMP ur Uni servers have absolutely no

Disable highmem and the problem goes away while halving your ram. That is
not very efficient is it?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.067 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site