lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Past CREDITS files
Date
From
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <mailgate@hometree.net> said:
> Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> writes:
>
> >Anyhow, the two-fold stable/devel system has been in effect since at
> >least 1.0, when we had 1.1->1.2 (then 1.3->2.0, 2.1->2.2, etc.)
> >Hopefully we can continue this tradition and have 2.5 start sometime!
>
> Personally, I'd consider 2.4 -> 2.9 -> 3.0

What are the earthshattering changes you foresee that would suggest going
for 3.0?
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand Usuario #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.105 / U:4.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site