[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ftruncate
> that it does NOT pass on 2.4.10-ac4.  It looks like the problem is with
> 2.4.11-pre1 and the testcase though if my man pages are right. The test
> is looking to get EACCESS back when the file is opened read only and
> ftruncate is called on it, but the man page says it should actually
> return EINVAL.
> A fixed version of this testcase will be in our next release. I know
> it's fairly trivial, but it would be nice to see this fix synced up with
> Linus's tree.

There are about 10 standards violations in the Linus tree against file
truncation behaviour (things like ftruncate > 2Gb without 64bit etc).
Merging them with the current scale of the fs/block changes in the current
Linus tree and their rate of change isnt feasible
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.029 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site