[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Security question: "Text file busy" overwriting executables but no (Alexander Viro)  wrote on 04.10.01 in <>:

> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > In short, now you need filesystem versioning at a per-page level etc.
> *ding* *ding* *ding* we have a near winner. Remember, folks, Hurd had been
> started by people who not only don't understand UNIX, but detest it.
> ITS/TWENEX refugees. And semantics in question comes from there -
> they had "open and make sure that anyone who tries to modify will get
> a new version, leaving one we'd opened unchanged".

Sounds to me like it could be done ... *if* you had per-process filesystem
snapshot capability.

Of course, that's using ICBMs to swat mosquitos. I don't recommend it just
for implementing a mmap() flag.

MfG Kai
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.104 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site