[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
On Oct 31, 2001  19:35 +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to set INITIAL_JIFFIES to zero before posting the patch.

Actually, it SHOULD stay non-zero to fix exactly those problems, otherwise
you need to wait a long time to test it... And the Linux development
process is "developers can't possibly test everything, so users need to
do testing as well.

> Testing with high INITIAL_JIFFIES values unfortunately still discloses
> instability after the wraparound even for an otherwise unpatched kernel.

Exactly my point. Leave it in.

> This of course needs to be
> for correct uptime display

Maybe for uptime display only, you could subtract INITIAL_JIFFIES from
jiffies, for printing, but leave the initial value as non-zero?

Cheers, Andreas
Andreas Dilger

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.073 / U:2.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site