lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Nasty suprise with uptime
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:50:43AM -0600, Tim Walberg wrote:

> Wouldn't it be fairly simple for the kernel to just remember the (wall
> clock) time at boot, and uptime just subtract that from the current
> (wall clock) time?

So every people with faulty CMOS batteries would have 30+ years of
uptime. And if the CMOS date is ahead of the real one and the admin
sets it back, you will get negative uptimes etc. If you want such
amusements, it is far easier to write an uptime program that just calls
random() instead of asking the kernel :)

Gabor

--
Gabor Gombas Eotvos Lorand University
E-mail: gombasg@inf.elte.hu Hungary
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.232 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site