[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:25:46PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> I fully well expect it to be. However, from the point of view of stability
> we *want* to be conservative and correct. If Al had to demonstrate with

Dave just told you what this change has to do with stability, not sure
why you keep reiterating about stability and correctness.

But of course going from page flush to the mm flush is fine from my part
too. As Linus noted a few days ago during swapout we're going to block
and reschedule all the time, so the range flush is going to be a noop in
real life (the whole thing is an heuristic), and this is why it wasn't
implemented right now. But I agree it shouldn't hurt either and it looks

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.100 / U:3.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site