lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ...
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > > Higher is better.
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > How does this test work exactly ?
> > Did You measure the run queue length while this was running ?
> > I'm going to modify LatSched to output other info like rqlen and
> > tsk->counter at switch time.
> > I'd like to have a schedcnt dump while this test is running.
> > Anyway this test shows that what i'm doing now ( working on the balancing
> > schemes ) is not wasted time :)
>
> Take a look at our OLS presentation slides starting at:
>
> http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/ols2001/img50.htm
>
> This is basically a message passing (via sockets) benchmark with
> high thread counts/runqueue lengths.

Are threads pre-created at startup or are dynamic ?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.061 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site