Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:45:02 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ... |
| |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput. > > > Higher is better. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > How does this test work exactly ? > > Did You measure the run queue length while this was running ? > > I'm going to modify LatSched to output other info like rqlen and > > tsk->counter at switch time. > > I'd like to have a schedcnt dump while this test is running. > > Anyway this test shows that what i'm doing now ( working on the balancing > > schemes ) is not wasted time :) > > Take a look at our OLS presentation slides starting at: > > http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/ols2001/img50.htm > > This is basically a message passing (via sockets) benchmark with > high thread counts/runqueue lengths.
Are threads pre-created at startup or are dynamic ?
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |