lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ...
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:14:47PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking at this again, it probably is preempt safe... I probably merged it
> > > wrong.
> > >
> > > I'll try to fit it into my next kernel...
> >
> > No probably You're right and I posted a wrong patch.
> > Try to get the one that is here :
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/mss.html
> >
>
> That's the one I have, xsched+lats-2.4.13-0.11.diff
>
> 2.4.13freeswan-1.91+ac5+preempt+netdev_random+vm_freeswap
>
> I think the main reject was against -ac5. You wouldn't by chance want to
> provide a patch against the -ac kernels, would you?

No, I prefer to work with vanilla versions.
It should not be a problem the merge anyway.
Look that the patch you donwloaded ( xsched+lats-* ) is the one that has
the LatSched latency sampler patch.




- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.054 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site