Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:01:41 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ... |
| |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:14:47PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > > Looking at this again, it probably is preempt safe... I probably merged it > > > wrong. > > > > > > I'll try to fit it into my next kernel... > > > > No probably You're right and I posted a wrong patch. > > Try to get the one that is here : > > > > http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/mss.html > > > > That's the one I have, xsched+lats-2.4.13-0.11.diff > > 2.4.13freeswan-1.91+ac5+preempt+netdev_random+vm_freeswap > > I think the main reject was against -ac5. You wouldn't by chance want to > provide a patch against the -ac kernels, would you?
No, I prefer to work with vanilla versions. It should not be a problem the merge anyway. Look that the patch you donwloaded ( xsched+lats-* ) is the one that has the LatSched latency sampler patch.
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |