lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[OT] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
bert hubert wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:37PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>
> > So, is there an implicit Linux policy to upgrade
> > the distro, or at least the kernel, every 496 days
> > whether it needs it or not?
>
> Having huge uptimes is by the way not adviseable operational policy
> according to many.

Well, it is certainly a calling card for reliability.

> Chances are you will be in for a nasty surprise when you
> reboot -

not bloody likely - if such a case did exist, big
brother would let us know immediately that a
service is missing.

> do you remember after a year which daemons you 'started by hand'
> and how?

All daemons are started with init scripts. If init
scripts do not exist for a particular service, they
are created and activated with checkconfig.

In addition, all installed programs are in rpm
format, and are installed in the most standard,
vanilla configuration possible.

cu

jjs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.142 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site