Messages in this thread |  | | From | Oden Eriksson <> | Subject | Re: Nasty suprise with uptime | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:43:08 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.25, Matt Bernstein wrote: > At 18:46 +1100 Neale Banks wrote: > >> It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box > > > >You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?
I think this thread is pretty stupid..., who with a little common sense ever treasure uptime? What's important is the total downtime..., and why...
I liked one idea that popped up here where one would use a random uptime..., that would get ignorant people to be amazed and wonder how _that_ could be....
-- Oden Eriksson
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |