Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:07:37 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c |
| |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> again from the cache with a minor fault, IMHO there's no way such tlb > flush removal can make a difference in a DBMS workload on a sanely > setup machine, I'm amazed you think it can make a difference.
You seem to be hammering on the DBMS scenario because Ben chose a bad example, without taking a step back and realising that his point is valid, though mostly with other examples.
Linus came up with a more efficient way to make sure we get to see (and clear) the accessed bits, lets use that one and get on with life.
regards,
Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |