[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Nasty suprise with uptime
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:37PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:

> So, is there an implicit Linux policy to upgrade
> the distro, or at least the kernel, every 496 days
> whether it needs it or not?

Having huge uptimes is by the way not adviseable operational policy
according to many. Chances are you will be in for a nasty surprise when you
reboot - do you remember after a year which daemons you 'started by hand'
and how?



-- Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.319 / U:1.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site