[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Whining about 2.5 (was Re: [PATCH] Re: bug? in using generic read/write functions to read/write block devices in 2.4.11-pre2)
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Rob Landley wrote:

> (Oh, and what's the deal with "classzones"? Linus told Andrea
> classzones were a dumb idea, and we'd regret it when we tried to
> inflict NUMA architecture on 2.5, but then went with Andrea's VM
> anyway, which I thought was based on classzones... Was that ever
> resolved? What the problem avoided? What IS a classzone, anyway?
> I'd be happy to RTFM, if anybody could tell me where TF the M is
> hiding...)

Classzones used to be a superset of the memory zones, so
if you have memory zones A, B and C you'd have classzone
Ac consisting of memory zone A, classzone Bc = {A + B}
and Cc = {A + B + C}.

This gives obvious problems for NUMA, suppose you have 4
nodes with zones 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A,
4B and 4C. Putting together classzones for these isn't
quite obvious and memory balancing will be complex ;)

Of course, nobody knows the exact definitions of classzones
in the new 2.4 VM since it's completely undocumented; lets
hope Andrea will document his code or we'll see a repeat of
the development chaos we had with the 2.2 VM...


DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? (volunteers needed)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:04    [W:0.039 / U:1.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site