lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 04:01:23PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Why would it take you two days to put together a test case for
> something so "trivial"? Don't be rediculious.

Well, maybe you like under testing things, but personally I don't. What
do you want a microoptimization? Get real, you don't accept
microoptimizations to networking code without numbers from the bigger
picture. So that means running real tests on real applications like
Oracle or RHDB. I think you'll find that the cross cpu case will be
quite happy with a range flush. Heck, it's the kind of IPI that can
even legally be asynchronous. Why don't you go do something useful
like implement that instead of making me spend my time to correct other
people's obvious mistakes?

-ben
--
Fish.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.129 / U:3.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site