lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Nasty suprise with uptime
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:20:02PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:31:12PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> > > Say it ain't so! maybe I'm a bit dense, but is the 2.4 kernel also going
> > > to wrap around after 497 days uptime? I'd be glad if someone would
> > > point out the error in my understanding.
> >
> > Ahh, so that's why there haven't been any reports of higher uptimes... ;)
>
> Yes, it all makes sense now -
>

Just imagine the headline:

Kernel 2.6 now allows uptimes higher than 1.47 years!

_Click_Here_

*Click*

.........

The change was origionally included in 2.5.4, which was origionally known as
2.4.14...

;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.255 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site