Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:28:09 -0800 | | From | Mike Fedyk <> | | Subject | Re: Nasty suprise with uptime |
| |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:20:02PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:31:12PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > > > Say it ain't so! maybe I'm a bit dense, but is the 2.4 kernel also going > > > to wrap around after 497 days uptime? I'd be glad if someone would > > > point out the error in my understanding. > > > > Ahh, so that's why there haven't been any reports of higher uptimes... ;) > > Yes, it all makes sense now - >
Just imagine the headline:
Kernel 2.6 now allows uptimes higher than 1.47 years!
_Click_Here_
*Click*
.........
The change was origionally included in 2.5.4, which was origionally known as 2.4.14...
;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |