Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:02:53 +0000 (GMT) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c |
| |
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > Think of CPUs with tagged tlbs and lots of entries. Or even a system that > only runs 1 threaded app. Easily triggerable. If people want to optimise > it, great. But go for correctness first, please...
But was the original flush_tlb_page() fully correct? In i386 it's if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm) __flush_tlb_one(addr); without reference to whether vma->vm_mm is active on another cpu.
Hugh
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |