[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c
    On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
    > Think of CPUs with tagged tlbs and lots of entries. Or even a system that
    > only runs 1 threaded app. Easily triggerable. If people want to optimise
    > it, great. But go for correctness first, please...

    But was the original flush_tlb_page() fully correct? In i386 it's
    if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm)
    without reference to whether vma->vm_mm is active on another cpu.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.021 / U:9.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site