[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Think of CPUs with tagged tlbs and lots of entries. Or even a system that
> only runs 1 threaded app. Easily triggerable. If people want to optimise
> it, great. But go for correctness first, please...

But was the original flush_tlb_page() fully correct? In i386 it's
if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm)
without reference to whether vma->vm_mm is active on another cpu.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.097 / U:8.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site