lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c
From
   From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:51:58 -0500

On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:50:56PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Numbers talk, bullshit walks.

There is a correct way to do this optimization. If you're enough
of an asshole to not care about doing it that way, great!

Doing range flushes is not the answer. It is going to be about
the same cost as doing per-page flushes.

The cost is doing the cross calls at all, not the granularity in which
we do them.

You're refusing to do any work to prove whether your case matters
at all in real life, and you're calling other people assholes for
asking that you do so.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.186 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site