Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Kevin D. Wooten" <> | Subject | Module Licensing? | Date | Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:46:35 -0700 |
| |
After reading the posts about the MODULE_LICENSE macro, I am in disbelief. I was under the impression that one could write a "closed-source" module and distribute it in binary form, and be in compliance. Please tell me I am wrong? We use Linux as a platform for some data acquisition, and we are currently distributing ( in very limited quantity to people who would already have signed an NDA ) modules that currently have no official license as yet. We are researching which license to use, but according to these post's we have almost no choice, Open Source or not at all!
-kw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |