[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> But was the original flush_tlb_page() fully correct? In i386 it's
> if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm)
> __flush_tlb_one(addr);
> without reference to whether vma->vm_mm is active on another cpu.

No, you're looking at the UP inline version - the SMP version is


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.177 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site