[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel compiler
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:31:08AM -0400, Frontgate Lab wrote:
> Just out of a need to know things :)
> What compiler do Alan Cox and Linus use to create the 2.4 series
> kernels?
> I am currently using RedHat's compiler gcc-2.96-85 and have been told
> not to do so because it "breaks things" .

This is likely due to the fact that some people are still living with
the misconception that all gcc-2.96 releases are buggy. They are not;
only early versions are.

gcc-2.95.[34] and gcc-2.96-(newer versions) are viable choices if you
want a working kernel. Some other versions might work, but then again,
they might not :-)
> So far it has not broken anything, but then again i am compiling kernels
> for use on my RedHat Distributions.
> The question would be .. how hard is it going to be for me to upgrade to
> gcc 3 + and will i get any benefit from it? WillI loose any
> advantages that i currently do have?

At the moment, gcc3 doesn't work too well with the kernel, and you won't
get any large benefit.

> Or can i still get what i need from compiling 2.4.12 or 2.4.13 with the
> compiler I have now?


/David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
\> </ Full colour fire </
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:10    [W:0.039 / U:3.752 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site