[lkml]   [2001]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kernel compiler
    On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:31:08AM -0400, Frontgate Lab wrote:
    > Just out of a need to know things :)
    > What compiler do Alan Cox and Linus use to create the 2.4 series
    > kernels?
    > I am currently using RedHat's compiler gcc-2.96-85 and have been told
    > not to do so because it "breaks things" .

    This is likely due to the fact that some people are still living with
    the misconception that all gcc-2.96 releases are buggy. They are not;
    only early versions are.

    gcc-2.95.[34] and gcc-2.96-(newer versions) are viable choices if you
    want a working kernel. Some other versions might work, but then again,
    they might not :-)
    > So far it has not broken anything, but then again i am compiling kernels
    > for use on my RedHat Distributions.
    > The question would be .. how hard is it going to be for me to upgrade to
    > gcc 3 + and will i get any benefit from it? WillI loose any
    > advantages that i currently do have?

    At the moment, gcc3 doesn't work too well with the kernel, and you won't
    get any large benefit.

    > Or can i still get what i need from compiling 2.4.12 or 2.4.13 with the
    > compiler I have now?


    /David Weinehall
    _ _
    // David Weinehall <> /> Northern lights wander \\
    // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
    \> </ Full colour fire </
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:10    [W:0.030 / U:4.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site